The Michigan Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments next month on whether the state’s anti-hazing law is unconstitutional. Attorney Edwar Zeineh is challenging the law after his client, Ethan Cao, ...
ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. After ...
ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. The Supreme Court has only eight cases scheduled for oral argument over two weeks ...
This article explains that since 1985, appeals as of right to the New York Court of Appeals require a final, legal dissent in favor of the appellant. In 2024, only 7% of appeals were based on such ...
EAST PALESTINE — Oral arguments in the appeal of last year’s $600 million settlement between Norfolk Southern and residents impacted by the 2023 train derailment related to how the legal fees were ...
ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. A federal statute makes non-citizens presumptively eligible for asylum (meaning ...