Early this month the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the idea that victims of so-called "reverse discrimination" — discrimination ...

On June 5, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous — yes, a unanimous decision — in the case of Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth ...

In the decision, the court held that federal civil rights statutes give members of majority groups the same right to sue as ...

In the end, the justices seemed to agree on almost everything—what Justice Neil Gorsuch called “radical agreement”—about the case of a straight white woman who said her employer discriminated against ...

California federal and state courts have never required workers claiming employment discrimination who are members of majority groups to prove more to establish their claims than members of ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5.

NEWSLETTERS The ‘reverse discrimination’ US Supreme Court ruling could’ve been much worse There are bigger battles ahead to fight.

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5.

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5. The ...

With DEI already under threat, employers are bracing for a wave of reverse discrimination claims from "majority" groups such as White people and men.